Does your resume sound like AI wrote it?

A 0–100 measure of how much your resume bullets read as AI-generated. It uses the same scanner Oliros runs on every kit we generate: a curated list of 90 phrases associated with AI writing (results-driven, leveraged, spearheaded, cross-functional collaboration to drive strategic initiatives, etc.), drawn from published research on AI-writing tells, plus a burstiness check on sentence rhythm. Higher score = reads more like you, less like AI.

Employers say AI-generated resumes without customization read as generic, and specific phrases, not AI use itself, are what gets a resume dismissed. Avoiding the phrases (without losing your voice) is the defensible move.

Nowhere. The scoring runs entirely in your browser using a pure JavaScript function. Your bullets are not uploaded, not logged, not stored. You can verify by opening DevTools → Network: zero requests fire when you score.

GPTZero and Originality.ai try to detect whether AI wrote your text using stylometric analysis (perplexity + burstiness). Those detectors are unreliable on non-native English. Liang et al. 2023 (Patterns) found over 61% of TOEFL essays by non-native writers were wrongly flagged as AI-generated. The Oliros AI-Tell Score does not attempt that judgement at all: it counts specific phrases and shows you which ones, so you can decide. It cannot mistake your writing for a machine's, because it never guesses who wrote it.

Yes, that's what Surgical Tailoring does. We rewrite flagged bullets with minimum edits (preserving your verbs, rhythm, and specifics), inject your real JD keywords, and reject any output that re-trips the AI-Tell scanner. Free to start, three variants per bullet, 'use original' is always an option.